The One That Got Away

Oh dear. Would the escape of this Mas Salamat guy be an excuse for more intrusion, less privacy, more surveillance, less rights in our Singapore?

In the meantime, call 999 (not 911) if you really saw him and do a public service.

A Jemaah Islamiah detainee has gotten away from Whitley Detenion Centre wherever that is and the manhunt is on. I think it will be a matter of time before he is arrested as Singapore is a small country and eventually someone will spot him or the police and military will hunt him down. The question of when and how comes to mind. The military are used to try and apprehend this lone crazy jihadi as the SAF is allowed to operate in Singapore under some amendment to the SAF Act last year. I think the Defence and Home Affairs ministries should pump in as many people as possible in a no-holds barred manhunt like they saturated Tekong a few years ago to look for some fugitives from Malaysia. I am not being sarcastic as the more boots on the ground the higher the chance of taking care of this guy, whatever the cynics say.

After our guys in green and blue get him, I expect some accountability.

Big Brother in China

News about China’s internet control is always very interesting. How different or same is it with the situation in Singapore?

Behind the Great Firewall

210 million Chinese have web access and any day now China will have more users than the US. But instead of spreading freedom, the net has been tamed by Beijing’s iron grip
Jonathan Watts in Beijing
The Guardian, Saturday February 9 2008

There were two very different snowstorms that blanketed China in the run-up to this week’s Spring Festival. The first, reported by the state media, was a natural disaster heroically battled by half a million troops and Communist Youth League volunteers. It left 5.8 million people stranded, but the people ultimately prevailed.

The second, reflected through the prism of internet cynics, was a calamity exacerbated by official incompetence, indolence and optimistic weather forecasts. While the old media have quoted “heartwarming words” of appreciation for the government’s response and praised its own “heroic” reporters, the internet has been abuzz with furious denunciations of state broadcasters, forecasters and officials for getting the picture wrong.

Such competing public opinions – unheard of 10 years ago – are becoming familiar in China these days as the world’s biggest censor struggles to cope with the explosive growth of the internet. With 200,000 new netizens every day, China’s online population is on the brink of overtaking the United States as the biggest in the world.

That landmark could come today, next week, or next month. According to the China Internet Network Information Centre, there were 210 million internet users at the end of last year, just 5 million behind the US. But China is adding 6 million new users a month – more than 10 times the pace of US growth.

In an Olympic year, and at a time of surging economic growth, the new figures are taken by some as proof of Beijing’s irresistible rise. Not everyone likes it. Free speech activists fear it will increase the influence of China’s censors in the virtual world. Foreign governments have raised concerns that the country has become a breeding ground for pirates, hackers and cyber spies.

It was not supposed to be like this. After the internet was connected to China in 1987, civil rights campaigners hoped it would be a catalyst for political reform. But 21 years on, the Communist party is still in power and its model of a tightly controlled internet is gaining ground, if only by force of numbers.

The world’s most popular blog? Lao Xu, written by the actor and director Xu Jinglei, which boasts 137 million visitors. The biggest distributor of online video? Tudou, which claims to have overtaken YouTube with over 1bn megabytes of data transfers every day. Then there is Baidu, which has trounced Google in the Mandarin search engine market, and Alibaba, whose boss Jack Ma is a national hero for humbling eBay and taking over Yahoo’s operations in China.

Language, culture and the Great Firewall of China – the state’s information shield – protect the government and big business players from competition. Instant messaging and social networking are dominated here by Tuscent’s QQ service. The game world is ruled by Shanda Entertainment and Giant Interactive rather than Nintendo and Sony. Sina and Sohu have a lockhold on the news. In every sector in China, domestic players are on top. Some are now starting to look overseas. Baidu recently launched a Japanese service.

Experts say that by overtaking the US as the world’s biggest user base, China will attract investment, commercial traffic and technology. With this will come influence.

“This is a big landmark. The US has almost reached the point where it has not much room to grow. China is the opposite. In terms of new connectivity and economic growth, China is definitely the place,” says Xiao Qiang, the founder of the California-based China Digital Times.

Beijing is thought to have the planet’s most sophisticated blocking equipment, which is used to guard virtual walls against external threats. Internally, it relies on a system of official monitoring and corporate self-censorship. Most of the routers and other parts come from US companies, such as Cisco. Campaigners suspect China is passing its censorship know-how to Cuba, Vietnam and several African countries.

“China is exporting a model where the internet is a tool for economical development, social networking, marketing business and propaganda, but not for free expression. China is very proud of this. They spent dozens of millions of euros to build firewalls, cyber-police and cyber-censors,” says Vincent Brossel of Reporters Without Borders.

Passionate

He says China is lobbying at an international level for more state control of the net, which is currently managed by a US-based independent organisation. “If this happens, it will be the end of the freedom of expression on the web.”

But the internet is also changing China and taking on characteristics not seen elsewhere. Compared with their counterparts in the US, surveys suggest Chinese netizens are more passionate about the web, three times more likely to feel freer in the virtual world than in reality, and more than twice as likely to consider themselves addicted.

With an average ago of 35 – seven years younger than in the US – they are primarily interested in entertainment, and believe the net is more satisfying in this respect than TV, movies or meeting friends. Pornography, a key driver of the internet elsewhere, is less of a factor in China, where the government routinely announces sweeps of online “spiritual pollution”. Last month, state media announced the closure of 44,000 websites and arrests of 868 people accused of providing “unhealthy” content.

The web in China may be far from puritanical but while “sex” is the most popular search term in many countries, Google reports that in China the most sought-after themes are related to money and technology. “Stock” is in the top six, along with the names of three leading banks.

The means of access are different too. The fastest growth last year was in rural areas. A third of users go online at net cafes, known as wangba (web bars).

The scene this week at a suburban wangba in Beijing was typical: scores of young people hunched in front of screens in a dimly lit room; the men in hoodies and parkas jabbing at their keyboards, blasting aliens and soldiers, while the women are transfixed by weepy Korean soaps and Taiwanese gameshows.

A few sleep at their consoles. One woman knits. There is an occasional grin, the odd laugh. But for the most part, the only sound is the clicking of mice and keyboards amid a motionless, expressionless multitude. However, the visitors say the wangba fills a hole in their lives.

“My life would be very boring without the net,” admits Yang Jing, a 19-year-old art student from Anhui, tearing herself away from a glitzy movie. “It’s just occupied with school and this – I watch films, play games and chat to friends. If we didn’t have the net, I wouldn’t know what to do.”

The Yi You cafe opened only a year ago, the newest in a chain that boasts half a dozen branches in Beijing alone. In the evenings the 300 chairs are quickly claimed; other outlets have even more screens. “The internet cafe business has developed very quickly in the last two years. They’re everywhere,” says the manager, Zong Cheng.

Jeremy Goldkorn, founder of the media blog Danwei.org, says the surge in users is changing China. “It is extremely significant that the internet growing at this rate because it makes it easier for information to get out,” he says. “I believe Chinese society in general is opening up. The internet is a cause of that, but it is also an effect. It won’t lead to revolution, but it will play a part in the evolution of public debate.”

Roland Soong, whose Zonaeuropa blog is one of the most respected sources of information about mainland websites, believes people in China have higher expectations of the internet.

“In other countries, there are other platforms for ordinary people to express themselves. In China, the internet is the sole platform for citizens to raise their voices.”

Fabricated

This enthusiasm sometimes manifests itself in alarming ways. Soong believes more stories are fabricated by people who want to promote themselves or their companies than in other countries. Online campaigns often turn into mob witchhunts, such as the recent targeting by BBS (bulletin board system) groups of a 13-year-old girl who was used by the authorities to justify tighter restrictions on online video content. In an interview with the state broadcaster CCTV she described it as “very yellow [pornographic], very violent”, which is fast becoming one of the slogans of the year.

But other cases suggest the net is proving a positive social force, by making unelected local governments more accountable. The recent killing of Wei Wenhua, who used his mobile phone to film a fight between municipal officials and villagers, rapidly became nationwide news thanks to the fury of internet bloggers. The authorities had no choice but to arrest four suspects and fire a local official. A Guangdong newspaper reports the case of a judge being supended after pictures were posted online of him chatting on his mobile phone during a court hearing. Forestry officials in Shaanxi face a furious backlash after confirming new pictures of the endangered South China tiger that later appear to be faked.

The proliferation of mobile phones, internet messaging services and bulletin boards has been cited as a major factor in recent middle-class street protests. The biggest last year saw a demonstration of thousands in Xiamen, Fujian province, against plans for a chemical factory. Mindful of public opinion, the authorities have backed down.

At a national level, the State Council Information Office – which overseas the internet – can still exert a tight grip. The recent detention of human rights campaigner Hu Jia and the house arrest of his wife and two-month-old daughter made headlines around the world. In China, it is as if it never happened. The two main news portals, Sina and Sohu, make no mention of the case. Searches on Baidu and Google produce a list of pages, many of which are blocked. Others are censored by the search engines themselves, but only Google admits this alongside the results. The authorities keep a permanent block on some sites, such as BBC news, Amnesty or non-government sources of information on Tibet, Taiwan, the Tiananmen Square massacre and Falun Gong. Propaganda officials send weekly lists of restricted topics to web administrators, who are then expected to censor themselves.

But with the internet expanding so fast, there is a limit to the number of blocking orders the government can send out or how widely it can impose its authority on small websites, such as blogs and bulletin boards. For that, it must rely on self-censorship, which is far from guaranteed.

Hong Bo, who blogs under the name Keso, says the opportunity to speak out online is cherished by a growing band of bloggers and BBS users.

“The Chinese internet has a distinctive character. Its one of the most strictly controlled in the world, but netizens’ behaviour still confounds the government’s expectations. They ban websites and delete posts, but they haven’t got everything under control.”

Isaac Mao, a pioneer blogger and researcher, says the number of users is less important than the quality of their online experience, where he says there is a big gap with the United States.

His organisation encourages netizens to connect their real and their virtual lives through blogs and discussions of social issues, including censorship.

“Rulers believe they can build a better system and get others to follow. But even though they want to change the internet, it is part of a globalised world and nobody can afford to build an isolated system.

“I believe the internet will change China more than China changes the internet.”

The TOC Fiasco – Truth is the First Casualty of War

The Online Citizen (TOC) conspiracy theory is one seriously complex issue. Allegations, half-truths and retelling of the story were from all sides. Jasper’s now convincing attack was vindictively personal and he would have gained more ground if he tried to be objective in his accusations, which were half correct or half wrong depending on your gut feel. Choo Zheng Xi was at first indignantly untruthful about his private arrangement with MP Ho Geok Choo but he reluctantly admitted that he was paid by the PAP to write, but not write for TOC but for a Boon Lay newsletter and being a political intern.

TOC steadfastly stood behind Zheng Xi, as band of brothers should in times of crisis. Surely TOC members might be feeling a bit chaffed that Zheng Xi’s shortsightedness and lack of total honesty got TOC such unnecessary unwanted attention. Presumably nobody in TOC besides Zheng Xi knew of the law student’s working ties with the Boon Lay GRC MP, as the alternative that other TOC members knew and were complicit in the initial silence is a something that would really destroy this emerging political blog.

Conspiracy theories will always run its course in the blogosphere. Years ago, tomorrow.sg also had its fair share of the spotlight as an insidious government trojan. Some time from now, another blog will get the dubious honour, ushering it into this hall of honour. That’s the way it is.

A little bit of give and a little bit of take

This is hilarious and it just reflects how immature some people are. I am not attacking religions, the opium of the masses as some would eagerly and maybe unfairly interject at this point, but I take a dim view of sensitive people who just are too intolerant of a teensy weensy tongue in cheek jibes.

Lots of sensitive religious turfing going around recently anyway with that supposed fatwa by the principal of Boon Lay Garden Primary banning non-halal food in the school’s canteen.  The last I heard that school is secular.

Want to use Jesus hand cream? Well, you can’t anymore. At least not in Singapore.

SINGAPORE (Reuters)

A Singapore-based retailer pulled a line of cheeky Jesus branded cosmetics from its shelves after complaints from irate Catholics, the local newspaper reported on Tuesday.

The cosmetics, called “Lookin’ Good for Jesus”, is made by American makeup company Blue Q. It was sold in three Topshop outlets in Singapore.

Wing Tai Holdings, which manages the Topshop brand in the city-state, pulled the items off its shelves late last month after some customers complained, the Straits Times newspaper reported.

“We don’t want to offend our customers,” a company spokesman was quoted by the paper as saying.

Reuters could not get a comment from Wing Tai as its offices were closed for the Lunar New Year holiday.

The Straits Times said Nick Chui, 27, a Catholic, spotted the items in a Topshop outlet and then wrote a letter to Wing Tai last month saying that the products trivialized Jesus Christ and Christianity.

“There are also sexual innuendoes in the messages and the way Jesus is portrayed in these products,” the paper quoted Chui as saying.

Some of the products sold include, a “virtuous vanilla” lip balm, hand and body cream and a mirrored Jesus statuette. They feature a drawing of Jesus flanked by two adoring women and carry slogans such as “Get tight with Christ”, “Get His Attention” and “Redeem Your Reputation and More”.

Blue Q also carries other tongue-in-cheek items such as a “Believe in God Breath Spray”.

In Singapore, about 50 percent of the population are Buddhists and 14.6 percent are Christian.